1. This note summarizes economic developments
and key reform priorities based on discussions held, and data
collected, during a recent mission to the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia (FRY). As the very weak data will require further
in-depth analysis, and as the reform priorities are based on
initial perceptions, the conclusions below are preliminary.
2. Recent economic developments. While
data problems obscure precise trends, the qualitative picture is
clear. Since 1989, FRY has seen severe declines in incomes and
output, particularly in industry. Average annual growth of 5
percent in 1994-1998 was halted in 1999, when recorded national
income fell by 20 percent and exports dropped by 50 percent. This
was the combined effect of the Kosovo conflict, tightened
sanctions, and chronic delays in structural reforms (the latter
supporting disinvestment in the enterprise sector). As a result,
recorded per capita GDP (relative to domestic prices) reached 40
percent of its 1989 level, one of the largest declines in the
region. Assessment of per capita GDP at market exchange rates is
complicated by the multiple exchange rate regime, especially by
the recent large differential between official and market exchange
rates. Preliminary estimates of 1999 per capita GDP range widely
from US$700 at the highly depreciated market exchange rate, to
over US$1300 at the official exchange rate. An intermediate value
of US$1,000 would place per capita GDP near levels in Bosnia and
Herzegovina and Albania. So far in 2000, total and industrial
output have rebounded modestly, as have foreign trade volumes.
Expected annual GDP growth of around 5% reflects the low 1999
base, with output and trade volumes remaining well below 1998
levels. It is difficult to assess if even this modest growth rate
could be achieved, given the disastrous drought which heavily
affected output of the still large agricultural sector.
3. The macroeconomic environment remains highly
unstable. Despite extensive controls on prices of 'essentials',
recorded retail price inflation rose from 50 percent in December
1999 to 100 percent in September 2000. The recent post-election
removal of many price controls could bring higher values for 2000
as a whole. This reflects the reliance on monetary financing of
past budget deficits, including a pre-election burst in spending.
The precise fiscal deficit is obscured by incorrect classification
of revenues, by extensive off-budget spending, and by the large
role of quasi-fiscal deficits (central bank losses, enterprise
losses due to low fixed output prices, etc). Quasi-fiscal
liabilities in the form of arrears are an economy-wide problem.
The government has accumulated arrears on pensions, family
allowances, state sector wages, and payment to farmers. Inter-enterprise
debts, many of which will fall on the budget, appear large and
unsustainable. Government policy to avoid massive bankruptcies
only fueled such arrears. The existence of this huge, albeit
difficult to measure, overhang represents a serious threat to
economic stability in the short- and medium-term, which calls for
prompt and coherent policy responses.
4. Balance of payments data are particularly
weak. For example, 1999 figures report a current account deficit
of US$1.34 billion (over 15 percent of GDP at the market exchange
rate). However, with errors and omissions of nearly the same
magnitude, and with numerous biases in data, the true current
account deficit is far from clear. FRY's ability to finance its
current account without visible capital inflows (limited FDI,
financial embargo) or significant foreign exchange reserves
remains a puzzle. Part of the financing could come via the shadow
economy. From late1999, official financing may account for around
$500 million. FRY also appears to be running up arrears to foreign
firms (particularly for energy payments), some of which are
increasingly reluctant to continue such financing. With few
obvious sources of financing, it is likely that actual current
account deficit is lower.
5. Foreign exchange reserves of the
National Bank of Yugoslavia (NBY) are now reported at US$385
million, or 1.2 months of goods imports. Current Bank staff
estimates place the stock of external debt, excluding recent large
trade credits, at around US$12 billion. The World Bank's share
amounts to some US$1.8 billion, 95 percent of which is in arrears.
Using the Atlas GNP for 1999 of US$ 10.8 billion, the ratio of
debt to GDP would be around 110 percent.
6. Poverty. About 46 percent of
the population is recorded as living below a US$1/day poverty
line, and about two-thirds below US$2/day poverty. Unlike in most
ECA countries, poverty appears concentrated in urban areas, which
were hardest hit by sanctions, conflict-related damage and delayed
reforms. Official unemployment (which excludes workers on unpaid
leave) is expected to rise from 26.5 percent in 1999 to 30 percent
in 2000. Unofficial estimates put the current rate at closer to 50
percent. About three-quarters of the jobless have been unemployed
for over one year. Average net wages in the Republic of Serbia are
US$40-45/month, about one-half the level in the Republic of
Montenegro, while average pension are about US$30/month.1
Arrears of two months on basic pension payments, and of two years
on farmers' pensions, and family and maternity benefits, erode the
effectiveness of the social protection system. Most of FRY is now
experiencing rolling power brownouts. There remain about 500,000
refugees (from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia) and 200,000
internally displaced persons (primarily from Kosovo).
7. Policy reform priorities. To
reverse the negative trends of the recent past, FRY needs to:
restore macro stability and internal/external balance; create the
basis for sustained growth; and improve social security for all of
its citizens. The near-term agenda (for the next one-half
year) is focused on social protection (humanitarian aid focused on
the energy sector), immediate stabilization measures, and
reintegration with the international community. This period will
also allow commencement of some particularly high-return public
works projects, e.g. clearing the Danube, provided these can be
funded externally.
8. The medium-term agenda combines rebuilding
and investment with transition to a market economy.
The former may need to focus less on direct damage (which one
FRY estimate places at US$4 billion), and more on undoing the
legacy of chronic economy-wide underinvestment and lack of
maintenance, and the associated weakness of enterprise balance
sheets. For these reasons, and due to chronic delays in reform,
FRY faces a surprisingly extensive agenda of first generation
transition reforms. These are aimed at improving fiscal
sustainability, raising efficiency and reducing unemployment.
Anti-corruption will be important for supporting poverty
reduction, growth and fiscal sustainability agendas. Initial
assessments point to 12 key areas of reform.
1) Managing the accumulated stock of
fiscal liabilities. This is the most difficult
element of the reform agenda. FRY's external debt stands at
about US$ 12 billion, three-quarters of which is in arrears.
Domestic fiscal liabilities are also large. The most significant
(about US$3 billion) arises from a past government promise to
compensate household foreign exchange deposits frozen nearly a
decade ago. Other claims will arise from the cost of restructuring
severely decapitalized enterprises and banks, and from meeting
accumulated arrears on wages, pensions and social benefits.
Total public debt is at least 150 percent of GDP. Such
commitments will severely strain public finances over a
sustained period, especially as Kosovo and the Republic of Montenegro
do not contribute to federal tax revenues.
2) Restoring medium-term fiscal
sustainability. FRY must also stem the creation of new
fiscal commitments. Limiting hidden liabilities requires greater
transparency and comprehensiveness in budget and public debt
management. Greater central bank independence would reduce the
ease of financing deficits. Better control of commitments
would limit the growth of direct budgetary arrears, while
the hardening of enterprise budget constraint would limit the
creation of quasi fiscal deficits. Finally, there is a need
to review current public expenditures with a view to limiting
the crowding out of those most crucial for economic efficiency
and social justice. Based on a cursory analysis, the most
obvious shifts in expenditures would be a move away from
defense, police, hidden enterprise subsidies and pensions, and
towards public investments and targeted social protection.
3) Pension reform. The current
pension system is fiscally unsustainable yet unable to ensure
adequate income for the elderly. In 1999, state pension payments
represented 16 percent of GDP, with a reported replacement rate
(average pens pension/average wage) of 75 percent. The 32
percent payroll tar rate allocated to pensions and disability
creates disincentives for employment. At the same time, pension
arrears of two months in the main system, and 24 months in the
farmers' pension system, can have serious poverty implications.
For example, pension arrears are not indexed, farmers' pensions
have fallen to around US$ 4/month.
4) Tax reform. The tax system
is excessively complex (up to 240 different levies), distorted
towards income taxation (particularly towards high payroll
taxes), and allows too much discretion to grant ad hoc
tax relief (thereby supporting corruption). All of these factors
hamper efficiency improvement and employment. In addition, with
tax rates being high in an already tight fiscal environment,
fiscal sustainability will be promoted by a rationalization of
the current tax system.
5) Anti-corruption. In addition
to liberalization to remove sources of rents, and reduction of
the level of discretion in policy, FRY needs to adopt a
comprehensive program to fight official corruption.
6) Labor market reform. The
combination of a brain drain and large refugee population places
additional strains on an already rigid labor market. This is
part of the reason for high unemployment. These rigidities
include a rigid collective bargaining structure, distortive
unemployment benefits, and ineffective employment bureaux.
7) Liberalization of domestic and
foreign trade. Until recently, controlled prices
represented 60 percent of the consumer basket. This was less a
legacy of socialism than of emergency economic policy. Most
prices need to be freed, with a regulatory regime for those
which remain fixed. To enhance competition, FRY needs to abolish
excessive trade restrictions (e.g. maximum margins, limits on
number of participants, etc.). In foreign trade, there is a need
to abolish trading monopolies, simplify the structure of tariffs
and lower their level, remove restrictions on trade with Bosnia
and Herzegovina and the Republic of Montenegro, and reduce
discretionary power of foreign trade and customs authorities.
This should be followed by deeper reform of customs.
8) Banking restructuring and
privatization. The combination of recession, the limited
level of reported bad loans, and weak banking supervision
(including a very accommodating approach to large banks) makes
it likely that most 'old' banks are technically insolvent. In
addition, these banks are burdened by the legacy of frozen
foreign exchange deposits. Financial restructuring of banks, a
prerequisite for their privatization, can be very costly for the
state budget. Yet, without good banks, enterprise restructuring
will fail. As in other former Yugoslav republics, there is a
need to reform the state monopoly payments system.
9) Enterprise restructuring and
privatization. As noted, sustained price controls have
led to the decapitalization of many larger firms, and to the
accumulation of inter-enterprise debts. These firms will require
financial restructuring before privatization. Future
restructuring will be supported by limitation of state support
and by imposition of a hard budget constraint. The best model
for privatization (stalled in the Republic of Serbia but
proceeding in the Republic of Montenegro) remains unclear, but
the process clearly needs to be made mandatory for firms and
placed on a clear timetable, with both domestic and foreign
firms allowed to participate.
10) Energy sector reform. This
sector (especially electrical power and local utilities)
suffered particularly from price controls and underinvestment,
and in some cases from direct damage. Thus, it combines high
physical investment needs with an extensive reform agenda,
including a review of pricing policy to prevent new losses and
to ensure protection of the poorest.
11) Social protection. The new
authorities cite the weakness of the social safety net as a
reason to postpone otherwise needed increases in prices for key
essentials. Unemployment insurance benefits are poorly targeted,
with high benefits for some classes of workers eroding the
incentives to search for new employment. Arrears on child
support and maternity benefits have also reached about two
years.
12) Statistical capacity. Design
and monitoring of a policy program is hampered by weaknesses in
economic and social data. Some data problems reflected
particular incentives (e.g. to smuggle and to under/overreport
certain variables) which will be reduced by a better policy
environment. In part this also reflects the erosion of capacity
resulting from the brain drain and sustained lack of external
contacts.