|
Table
of Contents | Next-> Chapter 6: The Need for Strong Institutions and Good Governance
The entire document
is available in PDF format (850 KB)
The Road to Stability and Prosperity in South
Eastern Europe
A Regional Strategy Paper
Chapter 5: Social
Inclusion and Social Change-Conditions for Peace and Prosperity in
the SEE Region
"Social Cohesion is one of the foremost
needs of the wider Europe and should be pursued as an essential
complement to the promotion of human rights and dignity." 43
A. Introduction
5.1 Much of the prospect of creating peace, stability and
prosperity in the SEE region will depend on the success of efforts
to establish stronger cohesion among the countries of the region.
One of the greatest casualties of war is the weakening of social
capital and dissolution of bonds of trust between individuals,
social groups and countries in the region. Even prior to the
current conflicts, decades of state socialist systems have left
civil society in South Eastern Europe weak and fragmented.
Only with a greater tolerance and willingness of the people
of the region to live side by side, will the dangers of renewed
armed conflicts be contained, investments take place, orderly
regional trade develop and economies flourish. Re-establishing and
further developing social cohesion needs, therefore, to be one of
the guiding principles when defining priorities and interventions
in the region under the Stability Pact. Measures will need to be
taken to mitigate the social exclusion created as a result of the
Balkan wars and from the economic declines experienced in the
region in the transition to market economies.
5.2 Social cohesion within and among SEE countries
is also threatened by wide differences in living standards, some
worsening social indicators and increasing poverty. Chapter 2
provides a summary of living standards and social indicators in the
region. While SEE countries inherited and largely continue to have
social indicators which are significantly better than countries of
similar income levels in other parts of the world, there is large
variation between SEE countries. Based on limited data available,
poverty has increased significantly during the transition. In
Bulgaria and Romania, poverty has risen from marginal levels at the
outset of the transition to significant levels by the end of the
1990s. In all countries of the region, rural poverty is worse than
urban, low educational levels of the household head is strongly
correlated with poverty, and large families and families with
unemployed household heads have among the highest poverty rates. In
all SEE countries, the Roma stand out as very poor and persistently
poor (see Chapter 2, Box 2.1). Poverty studies also point to limited
access of the poor to public services, especially safe drinking
water and sanitation, electricity, and secondary education. Many poor also have restricted access
to health services, owing to inability to pay formal or informal
charges.
5.3 The concept of social cohesion stems from a deep concern
about social exclusion, which in itself is a process leading
inevitably to a denial of human rights. The Council of Europe
Report on Human Dignity and Social Exclusion (Duffy Report) has
singled out social exclusion as one of the main threats to
democracy, human rights, human dignity and stability. Conceptually
social cohesion44 has been seen as combining the political
determination of governments to bring in social development
policies and make a success of them with their citizens'
aspirations towards greater solidarity. Social cohesion concerns
the society as a whole and all its members. It aims to promote
active participation in decision making, restore civic and social
ties, and develop sound relationships between state, market, and
civil society. As part of the efforts to create social cohesion,
vulnerable groups, minorities, people with disabilities, ethnic
groupings need to be assured integration into societies, access to
social services and benefits and in satisfying their social needs.
B.
The Need to Reduce Social Exclusion
5.4 Much of the social exclusion existing in SEE countries today
results from conflict, from years of economic transition, and from
underlying historical social patterns which predate the recent
period of conflict. All SEE countries have minority populations
and long histories of inter-ethnic conflict and, at times,
accommodation and cooperation. The conflicts in Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Croatia and Kosovo have led to separation of several
ethnic groupings into new nation states. Many minorities have
suffered atrocities and were forcibly displaced during recent
conflicts. The memory of long periods of conflict and displacement
has a lasting impact on the psyches and social fabric of
war-affected societies, even after formal hostilities have ceased
and many have returned home. UNHCR estimates that at least 1.7
million people, 6 percent of the population, are still displaced
in the countries which formerly were Yugoslavia. Millions remain
without access to property or stable livelihood. Others have not
suffered these massive disruptions but remain disadvantaged and
are prevented by a wide range of de jure and de facto obstacles
from full participation in education, accessing public services
and maximizing individual economic opportunities. Croats, Serbs,
Albanians, Hungarians, Greeks and others are minorities in one
country, yet majorities in adjoining societies. Roma live in all
SEE countries and some neighboring countries. They have suffered
from prejudice and exclusion for generations.
|
Table 5.1: Major Ethnic Groups In SEE Countries
a |
|
Country |
Population (in millions) |
Major Ethnic Groups |
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
4.3 |
Bosniacs (38%), Serbs, (40%), Croats (22%), Roma (1%)b |
|
Croatia |
4.8 |
Croats (78%), Serbs (12%), Roma (1%) b, Others
(9 %) |
|
FYROM |
2.1 |
Macedonians (66%), Albanians (23%), Turks (4%),
Roma (3%)b, Serbs (2%), Other (2%) |
|
FRY |
10.5 |
Serbs (63%), Albanians (14%), Montenegrins (6 %)
Hungarians (4%), Roma (4%)b, other
ethnicities (9%) |
|
Albania |
3.3 |
Albanians (95%), Greeks (3%), Roma (3)b |
|
Romania |
23.3 |
Romanians (89%), Hungarians (9%), Roma (9%) b |
|
Bulgaria |
8.2 |
Bulgarians (85%), Turks (9%), Roma (3%), Macedonians (3%) |
|
a. These data in some cases are not
consistent with nationally reported statistics. For instance,
Romanian Government statistical estimates for 1999 are:
Romanians, 90%; Hungarians, 7%; and Roma 4%; and total
population is estimated at 22.5 million. In Bulgaria,
according to the 1992 census, only about 10,000 people (0.1
percent of the population) identified themselves as
Macedonian.
b. Overall country statistics, particularly
concerning Roma populations, do not reconcile to 100 percent
due to rounding of numbers and use of differing sources and
should be viewed as expressing magnitudes rather than
definitive statements.
Source: General statistics are from
Amnesty International. Statistics on Roma are from Liegeois,
J-P., Roma, Gypsies, Travelers, Council of Europe,
1994. Statistics for successor states of the Former Yugoslavia
may not be completely accurate due to impacts of ethnic
cleansing and displacement across national borders related to
conflict. General statistics are from
Amnesty International. Statistics on Roma are from Liegeois,
J-P., Roma, Gypsies, Travelers, Council of Europe,
1994. Statistics for successor states of the Former Yugoslavia
may not be completely accurate due to impacts of ethnic
cleansing and displacement across national borders related to
conflict. |
5.5 The Roma community is perhaps the most visible minority in
the SEE region. Eastern Europe hosts most of the Roma communities,
with largest groups in FYR Macedonia, Romania, Slovak Republic and
Bulgaria. Most Romas live excluded from the social structures of
their countries, while engaging in diverse economic activities
which are often viewed by outsiders as being near the border of
legality. For many Romas an extended family continues to be the
focus of their existence, often more important than the increase
of individual wealth and material well being.
5.6 Apart from their vulnerable political situation, Romas are
one of the social groups which has suffered the most severe
economic deprivation during the process of transition from a
socialist to a market economy. They have generally been among the
first to become unemployed and given their low skill level have
found it difficult to find reemployment. Their health status is
generally significantly poorer than that of their host
communities. Access to health services remains limited due to
remoteness from facilities and lack of participation in normal
structure of service provision. Malnutrition is to be found among
some Roma communities, mostly affecting children and young
mothers. Illiteracy levels are high. A significant number of
school-age children never attend school and therefore remain
excluded from advancing in skill levels. With the support of NGOs
and international organizations, special efforts are now being
made by several SEE countries to reach out to the Roma community.
5.7 Animosity and distrust between ethnic groups represent
significant impediments to the exchange of goods, services and
ideas and present important barriers to trade and investment. De
jure and de facto obstacles to participation of minority groups in
education and economic opportunity deny the countries of SEE the
full utilization of its store of human capital. The perpetuation
of ethnic tensions and the threat of a return to conflict absorb
the time and efforts of the leaders of governments and
institutions of civil society. They limit the capacity to address
pressing issues of economy and governance. Ethnic exclusion
contributes to a perpetuation of an environment of conflict and
undermines efforts to promote intra-regional cooperation.
5.8 But social exclusion does not affect ethnic groups only;
societies are also divided along non-ethnic line. Years of warfare
as well as painful economic restructuring have left a wide range
of vulnerable groups in all segments of society and in all ethnic
groups. Economic restructuring and demobilization of soldiers has
and will continue to leave groups of able-bodied men and women
without employment. In addition, children, pensioners, widows,
orphans, war-disabled and other vulnerable groups need to be taken
into account, and targeted safety net strategies be put in place
to provide a minimum level of protection. The lingering
frustrations of the disenfranchised, the unemployed, the socially
marginalized fuel tension and unrest which could be redirected
into crime and civil violence, much of which may easily become
ethnically based. Special efforts need to be made to assure full
inclusion of women. Gender based exclusion has not primarily
resulted from conflict but represents an endemic element of social
relations. In addition to the overall objective of gender equality
from the standpoint of equity, inclusion and economic
productivity, it is also important to recognize the special role
that women and groups of women have played in the transition from
conflict in other areas of the world. Women to varying degrees
have played the role of peacemaker in many conflicts and the
support of women's associations to build bridges across ethnic
groups and national borders should be encouraged.
5.9 Of all the elements of social exclusion which prevent
regional stability and a return to normalcy, the situation of the
war-displaced is the most significant. Lasting peace requires a
sustainable resolution of the current situation of displacement
and consequent confusion of property rights of ethnic minorities
within/between the Bosnian entities, Croatia and FRY. Millions of
Serbs, Croats and Bosniacs are denied access to their homes and to
their most valuable assets, residential and commercial properties.
At least 20 percent of Bosnia and Herzegovina's population
remains displaced from their homes and many more have varying
degrees of access to their properties due to double occupation and
destruction. 340,000 Serbs from Croatia remain as refugees in FRY
and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Refugees and IDPs represent 13 percent
of the population of Montenegro.45 While this issue directly impacts
only these countries, it represents one of the most serious
constraints to regional stability and, in specific countries,
prevents the development of a sustainable, long-term vision for
development.
|
Table 5.2: Currently Displaced Persons (Refugees and IDPs)
in SEE Region
|
|
Country |
Total Population (millions) |
Displaced Persons (thousands) |
Percentage of Total Population |
|
Croatia |
4.6 |
69.5 |
1.5 |
|
BiH |
4.2 |
878.7 |
21 |
|
FRY |
10.6 |
747.3 |
7 |
|
FYR Macedonia |
2.0 |
21.9 |
1 |
|
Albania |
3.4 |
3.6 |
Negligible |
|
Total |
23.8 |
1,720.9 |
7 |
|
Source:
UNHCR, November 15, 1999.
|
5.10 These figures highlight the high level of displacement which
remains from the conflicts in South Eastern Europe. Numbers
reflect those currently displaced and still seeking sustainable
solutions, either the return home or integration. The true
significance of the displacement problem must also take into
account the wider effects of these displaced populations on the
communities where they are temporarily settled. In addition,
according to UNHCR figures, 209,000 citizens of BiH and FRY have
sought asylum in Europe since 1990.
5.11 Continued insecurity of housing tenure leads to less
incentive for individuals to invest in properties. This
instability may also be detrimental to long-term economic planning
and risk taking of households. The freezing of assets tied up in
residential properties represents, to some degree, a potential
store of small-scale investment capital which could otherwise be
available for economic activity. As long as the property situation
is uncertain, retention or distribution of "temporary"
rights may represent a perquisite for political loyalty which
could reinforce the position of political leaders and contribute
to polarized extremist politics.
5.12 Resolution of the situation of Internally Displaced Peoples
(IDPs) and refugees will require regional strategies and
reciprocal agreements among affected countries in close alignment
and sequencing with regional plans for productive investment. In
addition to the political and social difficulties of
reintegration, the poorly performing economies of many regions
limit the options of refugees and IDPs to gain their livelihoods
once they have returned home. Solutions will entail return of some
populations and provision of viable alternatives for others when
return is unlikely. The magnitude of these populations in some SEE
countries implies that significant economic gains and stability
will be dependent upon finding a sustainable solution to the
return or permanent integration of refugees and IDPs.
C. Investing in Social Cohesion and Institutional Capacity
5.13 Social cohesion will only develop if the peoples of the region
are prepared to strive for peace and collaboration. This requires,
inter alia, national leaderships determined to pursue these
objectives, values imbedded and taught in SEE societies which make
social cohesion and regional collaboration a desirable behavior,
policies which enforce mutual collaboration and interaction. Social
cohesion will further be developed through functioning institutions
which bring together ethnically, socially, economically diverse
groupings, and provide possibility for participation, representation
and dispute resolution. This will require strengthening of public as
well as non-governmental institutions, professional associations,
universities, women's associations, trade unions and other groups.
Equally important is the support of media open to all members of
society which supports participation and inclusion.
| Box
5.1: FYR Macedonia:
Promoting Inter-Ethnic Dialogue and Supporting the Learning
Environment of Youth affected by the Crisis
With two million inhabitants, the FYR
Macedonia is a multi-ethnic society consisting of Macedonians
(66.5 percent), Albanians (22.9 percent), Turks (3.9 percent),
Serbs (1.9 percent), Romas (1 percent), in addition to
other smaller minorities.46 Even before the escalation of the war
in Kosovo, NATO intervention and the flood of refugees, peaked
at 15 percent of its population, FYR Macedonia's different
ethnic communities had a fragile relationship. So far, internal
ethnic tensions have been successfully managed, but they
continue to put a strain on the country, particularly owing to
the situation in neighboring Kosovo.
Recognizing this, the World Bank in
partnership with UNICEF provided assistance through a Post
Conflict Grant of US$2 million aimed at supporting the
communities privately hosting refugees in Skopje, Tetovo,
Gostivar, and Kumanovo, among other municipalities. The project
specifically focused on ethnic conflict prevention by: (i)
improving the learning environment of Kosovar and Roma refugee
children, as well as Macedonian children from hosting
communities; (ii) creating an Early Child Development network of
mothers in disadvantaged communities predominantly inhabited by
ethnic minorities or mixed groups, benefiting 5,000 families;
(iii) promoting the inter-ethnic dialogues among youth through
video productions; and (iv) sponsoring participatory social
research addressed to the needs of conflict-affected and
minority groups. With the end of the emergency refugee crisis,
the project is being focused on Early Child Care and Development
and life education activities for youth, with special attention
to the Roma teenagers.
The project contributed to address the immediate emergency
needs resulting from the refugee crisis, while introducing and
testing new approaches to medium term conflict prevention, which
would have been more difficult to be adopted without the
pressures of a nearby conflict. Important experience was
developed about ways to support the immediate educational needs
of refugees, to improve the livelihood of disadvantaged ethnic
groups, to encourage social development in potentially
conflict-prone areas, and use the experience in conducting the
broader policy dialogue in South Eastern Europe.
|
D.
Education-Investing for Social Change and Human Capital Formation
5.14 Higher education for leadership formation. The
importance of education as an instrument of social change as well
as for human capital formation cannot be overemphasized. Special
higher education programs will be needed to form new élites from
the region able to perform leadership functions within the near
future. New leadership in the SEE region is needed to provide
political and social guidance to its peoples which will encourage
tolerance, respect of human rights, cooperation and collaboration.
Different education initiatives have started to be launched under
the enhanced "Graz Process" which has been assigned
under the Stability Pact as the "Lead Agency" to
coordinate and present education initiatives.47 The formation of
élites in multicultural settings, including students and learners
from SEE countries as well as non-SEE countries is essential. The
establishment of Centers of Learning in such multicultural
settings, possibly through the establishment of a University for
the South East European Region, similar as the Central European
University, or establishing a center of Higher Learning which
resembles the "College de Brugge" in the European Union,
are being debated. A proposal to establish a Dubrovnik Foundation
for Education and Culture has been advanced in order to foster
these objectives.48 Large scale student exchanges within the SEE
region and with other countries could be an essential element for
the reconciliation of future generations-as they have been in
the period after the Second World War to support the reintegration
of Germany into the international system and the assure the
rapprochement between the German and French youth as part of the
French-German Friendship treaty.
5.15 Education to establish peace and stability in the next
generation. Education of today's youth in the SEE
countries will be essential for laying the foundations for
tomorrow's peace and prosperity. Much of the support provided
needs to focus on the "youth" as their values and
actions will be the foundation for a more peaceful future. A
well-trained population which values diverse, multicultural,
democratic systems, supports their peaceful interaction and
cooperation, is needed that Stability Pact's objectives of
peace, stability and prosperity may become reality in the region.
Education systems which too narrowly focus within their own
national setting and do not reach out to the international
community and especially other SEE countries, could well run
counter to these objectives. Under the enhanced Graz Process
education programs have been discussed under: (i) Higher Education
and Its Role in the Development of Civil Society;
(ii) History and History Teaching; (iii) Education for
Democratic Citizenship; (iv) Education and the Management of
Diversity; and (v) Vocational Education and Training and its Role
in the Development of Civil Society.49
5.16 Education for human capital formation.
Well-trained human capital is essential for economic development.
Poverty in the region is strongly correlated with educational
attainments (see Chapter 2, Box 2.1). In comparison with other
countries of similar income levels, the SEE region has achieved
and maintained good education indicators. There is high demand for
education amongst people of the region. Participation rates have
remained high by international standards. Governments of the
region and their citizens often articulate pride in the traditions
of education in their countries. Yet, public allocations to
education remain low in all countries, except FYR Macedonia.
Fiscal allocations as shares of GDP have decreased during past
years in Albania and Bulgaria due to a decline in overall fiscal
envelopes. As all countries have experienced significant declines
in GDP throughout the transition, the education resource envelope
available for each student has declined significantly. In several
countries the institutional capacity in the education sector has
been weakened with dilapidated infrastructure, poorly paid,
trained and motivated teachers, outdated education materials,
curricula and teaching styles.
|
Table 5.3: Educational Indicators In SEE Countries |
|
|
1990 |
1992 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
|
Public Education Expenditure (% of GDP): |
|
Albania |
4.2 |
4.2 |
3.2 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Bulgaria |
- |
6.1 |
4.8 |
4.0 |
3.2 |
|
Croatia |
- |
- |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
FR Yugoslavia |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
FYR Macedonia |
5.9 |
5.4 |
5.7 |
5.7 |
5.9 |
|
Romania |
2.8 |
3.6 |
3.1 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
|
Primary School Enrollment rate: 1 |
|
Albania |
90.7 |
85.9 |
87.6 |
- |
- |
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Bulgaria |
98.6 |
95.1 |
94.3 |
93.7 |
93.6 |
|
Croatia |
94.0 |
79.0 |
89.0 |
88.0 |
89.0 |
|
FR Yugoslavia |
95.0 |
72.74 |
72.5 |
71.6 |
72.7 |
|
FYR Macedonia |
89.4 |
86.2 |
86.8 |
86.5 |
86.9 |
|
Romania |
89.5 |
89.6 |
91.4 |
92.6 |
93.9 |
|
Secondary school enrollment rate: 2 |
|
Albania |
79.1 |
47 |
38.1 |
36.6 |
38.5 |
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Bulgaria |
77.2 |
72.4 |
73.8 |
74.2 |
73.6 |
|
Croatia |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
FR Yugoslavia |
64.1 |
54.3 |
54.3 |
56.5 |
57.3 |
|
FYR Macedonia |
- |
- |
55.6 |
57.3 |
59.3 |
|
Romania |
90.8 |
67.0 |
65.7 |
68.3 |
68.1 |
|
Tertiary school enrollment rate: 3 |
|
Albania |
5.8 |
5.9 |
4.6 |
- |
- |
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Bulgaria |
18.8 |
19.8 |
23.0 |
26.0 |
27.3 |
|
Croatia |
- |
14.3 |
16.5 |
16.6 |
17.2 |
|
FR Yugoslavia |
16.9 |
13.7 |
14.5 |
14.9 |
16.5 |
|
FYR Macedonia |
- |
14.4 |
11.3 |
- |
- |
|
Romania |
10.1 |
12.2 |
13.4 |
13.3 |
18.6 |
|
Note: (1) gross rates, percent of
relevant population; (2) gross rates, percent of 15-18
population; (3) gross rates, percent of 18-22 population; (4)
The decline in primary enrollment rates was most importantly
caused by the exit of Kosovo Albanians from the official to a
parallel school system.
Source: World Development Indicators, TransMONEE
Database, IMF.
|
5.17 Human capital formation and the reforming and strengthening
of education systems is a long-term process which requires
substantial ongoing support. Most of the region's educational
systems must re-align to meet the needs of market economies and
open societies. All must reform their governance structure. In
virtually all of the SEE countries, the needs for physical
rehabilitation of school buildings and the provision of furniture,
equipment and learning materials are daunting. Even more important
are measures to improve the quality of education, the development
of institutions and capacities to manage and operate the education
systems so that they can fulfill their re-articulated objectives
will be a long and costly process. It is important that the
support for the establishment of performing education systems
should not be overlooked in the zeal to find solutions which will
have quicker, visible impacts under regional initiatives. In
improving the performance of education systems, one important
issue in the SEE region is the rising dropout rate of poor
students from secondary schooling-even if the returns to
education are estimated to be high. This phenomenon comes out
clearly in a number of poverty studies, most prominently for
Albania.50 As secondary education is important for skill formation
and access to the labor market, declining enrollments of the poor
in secondary schools can lay the foundation for further
segmentation of societies, by eroding their future employment
options.
E. A Focus on Youth-Creating Opportunities for Employment
and
Integration
5.18 Years of war, economic declines, and the transition from
planned to market economies have resulted in high levels of
unemployment. Lack of possibility to gain employment has
exacerbated the situation of many refugees and IDPs. Unemployment
is especially high among young people. Long disconnects between
the completion of school and entering into the labor market affect
work habits and values of future generations. Unemployed youth
often seek refuge in illegal activities and criminal organizations
posing serious obstacles to economic development and stability in
the region. The possibility to work and be an active part of
society is perceived by most members of society as a value of
itself. Finding employment for demobilized soldiers will pose a
special challenge. As a substantial demilitarization of many SEE
countries is required, additional employment opportunities will
need to be created for soldiers to be redeployed into the regular
labor force. Without such formal absorption of military personnel,
it is unlikely that significant gains will be made in
demilitarization.
5.19 Employment not only provides the opportunity to gain an
economic livelihood. It also provides a sense of dignity and
self-worth among most individuals, which is essential for the
creation of cohesive as well as inclusive societies. The need for
employment, ideally for all, but especially for youth, is
important to put to economic use underutilized human capital.
Equally important is the need to utilize the socialization which
comes along with structured employment to foster cohesion and
inclusion in the presently segregated societies in the SEE region.
5.20 Efficient employment will depend importantly on economic
growth brought about through stability in the region, economic
reforms, and investments in labor intensive industries. Yet, in
the short term, employment generation might be supported by
employment generation schemes targeted on youth and/or war
affected areas with high unemployment and poverty. These schemes
would need to be designed in such a way that they will not distort
labor markets or lead to economic efficiency. Selected employment
schemes might also need to be considered to further encourage the
return of refugees and IDPs. Special vocational training and
re-absorption programs might need to be considered and could be
financed from part of the savings achieved through
demilitarization. Employment and/or vocational training programs
for youth in post-conflict programs in the regions could well be
complemented through specific youth programs organized around
culture, sport and civil activities, to ensure that the younger
generation find incentives to integrate in the society and resist
the temptation of moving to criminal activities or join extremist
groups. Such programs, while generally rather inexpensive in cost,
can provide important directives to young people and provide fora
in which active forms of participation and inclusion can be
exercised.
|
Table 5.4: Levels of Unemployment in SEE Countries
(annual average, percentage)
|
|
Country |
1991 |
1993 |
1995 |
1997 |
1998e |
|
Albania |
9 |
29 |
15 |
15 |
18 |
|
Bulgaria |
11 |
16 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
|
Croatia |
13 |
15 |
15 |
18 |
17 |
|
FYR Macedonia |
19 |
28 |
38 |
36 |
35 |
|
Romania |
3 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
Source: EBRD, Transition Report 1999, World Bank estimates. |
5.21 To foster youth involvement in social development
activities, youth participation in civic activities, cultural
processes, entrepreneurial undertakings, and entertainment, needs
to be encouraged. Pilot projects should be launched which foster
social integration and community-based peace building. One example
of pilot project would be the promotion of cultural youth
networks, one for each country, by relying on telematic technology
and community-based youth cultural centers. The network would have
a web site with pages designed to respond to socio-cultural needs
and preferences of youth, as evidenced by social analysis.
Residents and expatriates of the country's diaspora in the world
and neighboring countries would be able to interact through a
number of peripherals placed in Youth Centers in country's urban
or rural nodes or in equivalent Internet-connected communities
abroad. The audience will access the site to: (a) draw from it,
but also; (b) nourish it with content generated by the audience
itself, as a result of organizing (and not only recording)
community/city events, cultural interviews, entertainment
programs, seminars on "education for life", reading of
new books, visits to the region's cultural heritage monuments,
and contests.
F. Creating an Inclusive Civil Society
5.22 Efforts will need to be made to strengthen all elements of
civil society which add to social cohesion and inclusiveness. This
will require some well-targeted visible interventions which carry
sufficient momentum so that they reach beyond localized
initiatives. Civil society groupings which are exclusive in
nature, organized for example along ethnic identities or religious
extremism, can add to the segregation of a society and push
communities apart. Strengthening civil society along overarching
themes, such as professional organizations, chambers of commerce,
and trade associations has proven effective in other societies to
reach for integration. An important role can be played by Western
European civil society organizations in trying to help and support
groups in SEE that would support integration and reconciliation
and giving these groups means to develop and expand.
G. Opening Media and Knowledge Transfer
5.23 In an increasingly globalized world, the SEE countries will
benefit from integration into the knowledge transfer through
provision of technology and multiple access to media. Opening up
of multiple media channels will increase the possibility of
different groups in society to make themselves not only heard and
understood, but also to control propaganda which might be
disseminated through controlled media systems. A modernized media
system also allows for knowledge transfer to large number of
people and to connect the people of SEE countries to an
increasingly integrated world.
5.24 A special focus should be placed on providing technology so
that knowledge transfer can take place. Special programs to
provide access to the internet, directed to institutions of higher
learning, secondary schools, government and parliamentary
organizations, public institutions, civil society, etc. could be
an important tool in bringing new objectives and ideas to
inspiring leaders in SEE countries and to reach conciliation. The
attractiveness of surfing the internet and communicating together
across borders might quickly entice young people in SEE countries
to adjust their aspirations and reach out beyond the restricted
horizons in which they otherwise live. The technological means to
connect to a broader world, shaped according to different values,
might prove to be a more potent means of inclusion-allowing
possibly for both, knowledge and value transfers.
H. Protecting Social Rights
5.25 Protection of social rights will be essential to
further strengthen social cohesion within and among SEE countries.
The European Social Charter, which is regarded as the counterpart
of the European Convention on Human Rights in the economic and
social sphere, was signed in 1961. The Social Charter has
subsequently been updated by a series of protocols; the revised
Charter is dated 1996. The Social Charter safeguards nineteen
fundamental rights plus another four enshrined in its additional
Protocol of 1988. These rights can be divided into several groups:
rights relating to work, the right to organize and to bargain
collectively, rights relating to the protection of workers, rights
relating to vocational training and the rights of foreign workers.
Among SEE countries, Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia and FYR Macedonia
have signed, Slovenia and Romania have ratified the Charter. While
rights embedded into the European Social Charter will need to be
interpreted within the economic realities of the SEE countries,
the charter presents the social rights that SEE countries should
strive towards in order to assure and strengthen social cohesion
inclusive of all members of their societies. In addition to the
rights enshrined in the European Social Charter, the European Code
of Social Security (revised) of the Council of Europe guarantees a
minimum level of social security protection and lays out a common
framework of social standards. Albania, Bulgaria, and FYR
Macedonia have asked for assistance from the Council of Europe to
develop their social protection system towards these standards. It
will, however, take time for SEE economies to achieve sufficiently
high levels of labor productivity, employment, and economic
performance with sufficient fiscal revenue to sustain a social
protection system as outlined in the European Code of Social
Security.
I. Conclusion
5.26 Governments, civil society, international partners need to
pursue multiple avenues to support social cohesion and inclusion
in the SEE region and within SEE countries. These should include
the development of élites and leaders from SEE countries which
respect and support the values of open, multi-ethnic and diverse
societies. Educational programs, especially in higher education,
exchanges within SEE and with other countries are essential.
Cultural programs, support to allow access to media and to the
"Global knowledge system" are important to allow the
people of the SEE region to share and absorb values which are
shaped by other considerations than the pursuit of nationalist
objectives. Multiple efforts will be needed to make domestic
institutions inclusive to all members of societies and to hold
them accountable to its citizens. A special focus on youth is
essential to allow for the development of an open, tolerant future
generation. Providing perspectives, possibilities for productive
employment and engagement within the region and the SEE countries
will be essential for fostering cohesion and building foundations
for a stable and prosperous region.
5.27 The formation of open, tolerant and cohesive societies require
access to social services and efforts to constrain poverty. But
education systems need to be utilized not only for the transfer of
knowledge and the development of skills, but as a process of
modernization and value change. Changes in curriculum, teacher
behavior, learning content, and learning styles are essential in order
to assure that education will lead to development of values and
behavior which are consistent with objectives of social cohesion and
inclusion. Social rights to be protected are most comprehensively
presented in the European Social Charter which most of the SEE
countries have already signed. It lays out an important road map to
the guarantees of social rights, which SEE countries should strive to
achieve within the limitations of their own economic development
objectives and possibilities.
43 Council
of Europe (1997) Final Declaration, Second Summit of Heads of State and
Governments of the Council of Europe.
44 Council
of Europe (1998) Opportunity and Risk: Trends of Social Exclusion in Europe.
45 These
figures are based upon UNHCR statistics.
46 1994
census.
47 See
Conclusions of Working Table on Democratization and Human Rights, Geneva,
October 18/19, 1999.
48 See
CEPES, The Future of Education and Training in South-East Europe, Brussels,
October 1999.
49 See
International Conference on South Eastern Europe "Educational
Co-operation for Peace, Stability and Democracy", Expert Conference in
the Framework of the Enhanced Graz Process, Stability Pact for South Eastern
Europe, Working Table 1.
50 See
Box 2.1.
Table
of Contents | Next->Chapter 6: The Need for Strong Institutions and Good Governance
The Road to Stability and Prosperity in South
Eastern Europe is also available in PDF format (850 KB)
|