|
Statement by the IMF Staff
Representative
1. Thank you for the
opportunity to participate in this meeting. I will concentrate my
remarks on the current economic situation in SM, relations with the
IMF, and the outlook for 2004.
2. Economic
performance remains generally favorable.
-
Inflation at
end-2003 is projected to be at, or slightly below, the lower end
of the 9-11 percent target, compared with 14 percent at
end-2002.
-
Real GDP is
expected to grow by about 3 percent in 2003, somewhat less than
programed.
-
The current
account deficit (before grants) is expected to decline in
relation to GDP, in line with the program, reflecting a
deceleration in both exports and imports and buoyant private
remittances. However, it remains large at a projected 11 percent
of GDP in 2003 and its financing depends in large part on
private capital inflows that are sensitive to changes to market
sentiment.
-
Owing largely to
unexpectedly large privatization proceeds, the capital account
surplus in 2003 has been large enough to not only cover the
current account deficit but also to raise the official foreign
exchange reserves to about $3.5 billion or 4.5 months of
imports. FDI is expected to amount to $1.2 billion (6 percent of
GDP) in 2003, twice the amount targeted under the program.
3. Policies are
generally on track. The IMF Executive Board completed the second
review under the 2002-05 Extended Arrangement in July. The
end-September fiscal, credit and external targets-monitored through
performance criteria-were observed comfortably.1.
Indicative targets regarding the wage bill of the 7 largest
enterprises and the ceiling on the Serbian banking system NDA were
observed, but problems have persisted in the area of government
expenditure arrears. All but one of the structural benchmarks
through end-September have been observed, albeit with some delays.
Adoption of a resolution plan for the largest Serbian bank has been
delayed in part by management changes at the central bank and the
Bank Rehabilitation Agency.
4. The IMF staff
mission that visited Belgrade and Podgorica in the second half of
October for discussions on the third review under the Extended
Arrangement reached preliminary agreement on most aspects of a
program for 2004. The IMF Board could have considered the third
review (including a financing assurances review) in January 2004
assuming agreement on a few remaining issues and 2004 budgets
consistent with policy understandings. However, the holding of early
elections in Serbia will delay completion of the review. An IMF
staff mission is envisaged to return to Belgrade, once a new
government is in place, to review the situation and seek to finalize
discussions on policies for 2004, including a Serbian budget.
Against the backdrop of relatively modest output and export growth,
and a large current account deficit reflecting in part strong
consumer demand, we expect that the new government's policy strategy
for 2004 will remain unchanged and aim to strengthen external
competitiveness and narrow the current account deficit, including by
containing the growth in domestic demand and costs.
5. The October
mission reached a preliminary agreement on reducing the fiscal
deficit in 2004 but the staff continues to be concerned about the
composition of the fiscal adjustment in the Serbian budget submitted
to parliament and the policies underlying the draft Montenegrin
budget.2 According to the proposed
Serbian budget, total spending would remain roughly unchanged in
relation to GDP, with investment spending rising by 0.6 percentage
points. Spending on wages and subsidies-which remains rather
high-would decline only slightly in relation to GDP, reflecting in
part above-average wage increases for the police and the
retrenchment costs arising from the restructuring banks and
enterprises. The new government should consider a further
containment of wage spending and subsidies as a basis for the 2004
budget. It should also proceed, as currently envisaged, with the
implementation of a major tax reform, including the introduction of
a VAT and the streamlining of income tax and social security
contributions in mid-2004. As regards Montenegro, the staff is
concerned about the implications for the deficit and fiscal
sustainability of recently announced plans to lower personal income
taxation.
6. Structural
reforms should cover a broad area. In the banking sector,
progress is envisaged in restructuring the largest domestic bank in
preparation for its privatization and in privatizing the remaining
banks in which the state has an equity participation. With the
pipeline of readily privatizable socially-owned enterprises drying
up, focus will shift toward the restructuring of state enterprises
and insolvent socially-owned enterprises to facilitate their
privatization. The implementation of a new bankruptcy law should
underpin the hardening of budget constraints.
7. SM's external
financing needs will remain large over the medium term. While
the current account deficit is expected to narrow further in 2004
and beyond, it would remain relatively high given the substantial
need for investment imports. On the other hand, the early success in
generating once-off, large privatization proceeds from the sale of
enterprises in highly profitable sectors cannot be sustained as the
privatization effort shifts to less successful enterprises.
Accordingly, privatization proceeds in 2004 are expected to be
sharply lower than in 2003, and financing needs-to be met by
external grants and loans from official creditors, excluding
purchases from the Fund-are estimated at about $1.0 billion, of
which $0.3 billion in the form of BoP/budgetary support. In this
connection, the authorities should continue their efforts to reach
debt restructuring agreements with remaining creditors on terms
comparable to those granted by the Paris Club.
8. External and
public sector debt sustainability will require sustained
implementation of policies to support growth and strengthen the
external position. In light of the initial conditions, the
policy challenges-notably in restructuring the largely insolvent
enterprise sector without endangering the fiscal position-are
daunting and will require continued support for the reforms at home
and abroad.
1
The general government deficit in Serbia, net of foreign-financed
projects, amounted to 1.7 percent of annual GDP in
January-September, in line with the annual target, reflecting good
revenue performance and expenditure reallocation to provide for the
higher-than-envisaged need for transfers to the social funds. The
general government deficit in Montenegro was 0.2 percent of annual
GDP (2.9 percent of Montenegro's GDP) in January-September 2003, in
line with the program target, reflecting a substantial improvement
in tax revenue over the first half-year.
2
Montenegro accounts for about 7 percent of the SM economy.
|