Donors Meeting for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Brussels,
March 12, 2002
Opening Remarks by Mr. Christiaan
Poortman, Country Director and Regional Coordinator for Southeast
Europe, The World Bank
At the beginning of
2001, FYR Macedonia was a country with stable macroeconomic
conditions, implementing comprehensive structural reforms, and
receiving increasing inflows of private investment. Economic growth
was projected at 5-6 percent for 2001, and external financing needs
from official sources were expected to be small.
The recent conflict
brought losses of lives, massive displacement of the population at
the height of the crisis, and imposed a significant economic
setback, as described in detail in the background documents prepared
for this meeting. Instead of growing dynamically, as projected at
the beginning of last year, GDP fell by almost 5 percent in 2001. We
are here today to discuss how the international community could best
support the authorities with exceptional assistance to overcome the
effects of the conflict and put the country back on the path to
economic recovery and social development.
We will be seeking
close to €260 million from donors to help the authorities build up
the country's international reserves to enhance macroeconomic
stability, repair conflict-related damages, and embark on the full
implementation of the Framework Agreement. At the same time, we will
be also seeking commitment from the authorities to pursue sound
macroeconomic policies, and reinvigorate economic reforms.
We welcome the
authorities' agreement with the IMF, at the end of last year, on a
Staff Monitored Program. I am sure that all of us in this room will
follow closely the implementation of this program as an indication
of the government's commitment to sound macroeconomic management,
and look forward to an upper credit tranche arrangement during the
course of the year.
While focusing on
macroeconomic stability is absolutely necessary, it is not enough.
FYR Macedonia needs to continue with the economic reforms that lead
to sustainable economic growth and increasing living standards, so
important for a society that went through the shocks of the recent
conflict. Indeed, long term economic recovery and growth will be an
important element in the process of national reconciliation and
integration. I see three major areas of priority for the years to
come:
- Private sector growth and job
creation;
- Enhancing the efficiency of the
state; and
- Alleviation of poverty and
development of human capital
Let me briefly make a few comments on
each of these priorities.
There is no question
that the private sector will remain the engine of growth and the
major provider of jobs in FYR Macedonia. During the past few years,
the authorities have made progress in banking reforms but much less
has been achieved in the enterprise sector, partly as a result of
the conflict. Under the current circumstances, the government will
need to re-double its efforts to encourage the development of the
private sector, attract direct foreign investment, and resolve, with
appropriate social sensitivity, the many loss-making enterprises
that represent a drain on the budget. Clear "rules of the
game" and full transparency are essential in all this.
During the last 12-18
months, the authorities have been working (with the World Bank) on a
comprehensive program of public sector management reforms. Despite
the conflict, there have been several areas where advances were
made. But this is a multi-year effort, and the implementation of the
Framework Agreement will represent new challenges. In particular,
the devolution of responsibilities to local authorities will change
in many ways how the public sector operates in FYR Macedonia.
Designing an appropriate framework for this to happen in an orderly
fashion, and building capacity at the local level will be a
formidable task. We will need to assist the parties in finding the
most effective and least costly path of implementation.
As we have learned
from experience throughout Central and Eastern Europe, transition
reforms could lead to income disparities and at least temporarily
growing level of poverty in some parts of society. The conflict in
FYR Macedonia has created additional vulnerable groups, including
many of those who remain displaced. The authorities will need to
continue to pay special attention to the issue of poverty, and we
are encouraged that the work on defining a poverty alleviation
strategy has continued even during the conflict. Finally, education,
and more broadly, the development of human capital, will need to
remain a high priority given its role in economic development and
reduction of poverty.
Let me conclude by
saying that we are here to help the authorities to overcome what we
all hope is a temporary economic setback. By doing so, we are not
only assisting FYR Macedonia-we are also providing an important
element in our commonly-shared strategy to bring economic and social
prosperity to Southeast Europe. As such, the commitments made at
this Meeting-on the side of FYR Macedonia as well as the side of the
international community-fit into the broader framework for regional
peace and stability.
|