Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Donors' Conference
Brussels,
June 29, 2001
Statement by Miroljub Labus,
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Economic Relations,
Federal Government of FR Yugoslavia
This
statement is also available as audio recording (Real Audio format)
In
December last year, at the Donors’ Coordination Meeting, I
delivered a speech titled “Vision for the FRY: Breaking with the
Past, Building a Democratic and Prosperous Country”. It was
a vision paper. Please allow me now, 6 months later, to point out to
the achievements and to reiterate the commitments of all
pro-European democratic forces in my country.
Vision and Achievements
The
new Governments committed themselves to a peaceful and democratic
resolution of all inherited problems and conflicts. Accordingly FR
Yugoslavia considerably contributed to enhancing the stability in
the Region. Conflict in Southern Serbia, provoked by the armed
extremists, is peacefully resolved. It is due to the so-called
“Covic Plan” (launched by the Deputy Prime Minister of Serbia)
that the peaceful solution to this deep crisis is brought about and
that the process of integration of the Albanian minority into the
economic and political system of Serbia is put on the agenda.
At the same time, the mechanism of cooperation between NATO and the
Yugoslav Army is established, which in the long run paves the way to
the Partnership for Peace Agreement.
We
promised the clear cut-off with the past. We are on that way. After
a decade of dramatic economic decline including trade isolation and
sanctions, FR Yugoslavia has started radical reforms. We are in the
middle of a very complicated process of changing almost completely
our political and economic system, including bold changes of both
legislation and its enforcement. This process is long and painful,
but we are determined to win. We have demonstrated that by adopting
the legal framework for cooperation with the Hague Tribunal (ICTY).
However, the issue of cooperation with the ICTY is a complex one and
will require considerable efforts and good will on the both sides.
The
ongoing debate on the cooperation with ICTY has emphasized two
fundamental issues. One is the legal procedure by which we will meet
our international obligations as a full member of the UN. The other
one is rather European. We are on the crossroads. Which track for
Europe should the country go – fast or a slow one? We have
demonstrated that the fast track is our choice.
In
order to take fast track to Europe, reform forces in Yugoslavia are
pursuing bold economic reform even without proper financial support
to mitigated huge social costs of the transition. We have lifted the
price control, liberalised trade and impose new taxes. That created
additional burden to already impoverished people. They are still
prepared to support us and reforms. But all of us know that their
patience and resources are limited. We are appealing to the
donors’ community to share with us the burden of transition.
We
are aware that the first step on the fast track to Europe is through
regional cooperation. My Government is fully committed to contribute
further to this process. We have demonstrated that commitment by
implementing the new policy and approach to the succession process
of the former Yugoslavia. The agreement has already been reached and
will be signed today in Vienna. The chapter of conflicts at the
territory of Former Yugoslavia is closed and the conditions for
future cooperation are created. Furthermore, two days ago we signed
the Memorandum of Understanding on Trade Liberalisation and
Facilitation in the Region. That document brought our Region closer
to the European mainstream.
Of
course, there are many unfinished jobs and we are together today to
discuss the means and time of the accomplishment. The Donors
Conference is an important framework coordinating the joint efforts
on that task.
Transition and Post-conflict
Problems
Allow
me to now address some specific economic issues. After more than a
decade of wars, dramatic political instability, economic decline,
international sanctions, mismanagement and corruption, the FR
Yugoslavia is embarking on a path of radical economic reforms with
ambitious goals.
We
are determined to catch up rapidly with other Central European
transition economies, to fully integrate our country in the global
World economy and to join the European Union as a full member in
about seven to ten years.
However,
these ambitious yet achievable aims contrast starkly with the
current difficult economic realities – legacy of Milosevic's
Government and its economic mismanagement. Around 35% of the labour
force are officially or effectively unemployed, 70% of population
live below or close to the regional poverty line, and around 600,000
refugees and internally displaced persons lack basic necessities.
Overall,
people have to cope with very low salaries even by low regional
standards. Savings are very low and many segments of the society
have run out of reserves. Any further shock to the standard of
living would be devastating for them. The infrastructure is
suffering from many years of decay, mismanagement and the
consequences of the NATO 1999 bombing campaign. After being swindled
several times by state and private banks in the 90s, the population
has lost trust in the banking sector and the level of monetisation
is exceptionally low at 3-4% of GDP. Bad debts and inter-enterprise
arrears are a permanent threat to macroeconomic stability as they
represent, according to available estimates, around 80% of the GDP.
Finally, the level of foreign debt (12,2 billion U$) represents
approximately 140% of the GDP. The problems we are coping with are
thoroughly analysed in the WB Report "Breaking with the
Past".
Accordingly,
the FR Yugoslavia is facing both transition and post-conflict
problems. After leading the transition process at the beginning of
the decade, the country is now lagging behind the most advanced
transition economies. Its reform path has to recognise this specific
feature and to be very dynamic and ambitious.
Reform and Regional Stability
There
are a few additional specific features of our transition to market
economy.
The
transition in FR Yugoslavia is fast, perhaps faster than in any
other CEE country, not because some one is pushing us to that, but
because we do believe in the reform. We strongly believe in free
market economy, private property, democracy and the rule of the law.
Accordingly there is no need for any kind of outside pressure on the
Government to be on the reform path or to respect its international
obligations.
We
have already mobilised all our internal resources to overcome our
dire starting position and to reform rapidly. The FRY certainly does
not want to become dependent on foreign assistance. We want to be a
self-sustaining country, benefiting mostly from foreign private
direct investment flows and international trade. We recognise the
need to restructure deeply our economy. However, given the enormous
weight of the past, we will require significant support from the
international community in the short term to succeed, in particular
from the European Union, other governments, and International
Financial Institutions such as the World Bank, the IMF, the EBRD,
the OECD and others. This support would be squarely aimed at
“breaking with the past” by relieving the country from the
effects of accumulated arrears and debts, so as to be able to focus
above all on building a new, democratic and prosperous, Yugoslavia.
We
expect that our reform program will attract significant support from
the international community. We have benefited from the start of the
democratic transformation from a quick mobilisation of humanitarian
aid of the international community. We are extremely grateful for
this help. We expect that now the international community will
support us for our move towards the future.
Economic
Stability
Our
achievements in the recent nine months are the following. On the
macroeconomic front, we have achieved stabilisation based on the
exchange rate unification and stabilisation, curbing down inflation
(although substantial utilities' price adjustments took place) and
increasing our foreign exchange reserves to 700 million USD. We
deregulated and liberalised our foreign trade, abolishing non-tariff
barriers, decreasing tariff rates and simplifying the rate
structure. That cleared the way for our accession to the WTO, which
we expect to take place in next few years. Furthermore we have
started the reform of our Customs administration, fighting
corruption and cronyism, and establishing simple and transparent
procedures.
The
National Bank of Yugoslavia become an independent institution and no
daily and partisan politics have any influence of decision making in
the institution. The National bank of Yugoslavia has prepared a
commercial bank reconstruction program, distinguishing four
categories of banks and the strategy for dealing with these banks.
Insolvent banks with no overall importance are already in the
process of liquidation. Furthermore, we have started to service the
debt on frozen foreign currency savings of the households.
On
the international front, we have resumed or established membership
in the IMF, the World Bank and the EBRD and concluded the Stand-By
Arrangement with the IMF. We expect that FR Yugoslavia will soon
become a country of the European Investment Bank operations. We are
about to start the process of Stabilisation and Accessions to the EU.
Challenges and Priorities
There
are two big challenges. Both of them are short-term issues, but the
outcome of both will have long term political effects. The first one
is the recession of the Yugoslav economy. There is virtually no
economic growth, export is lagging, foreign trade balance is
negative, etc. There must be a dramatic overturn of these
tendencies. The Government must demonstrate the ability to provide
an impetus for economic growth and increased wellbeing of the
population.
As
to the foreign debt, substantial debt relief must be accomplished.
Even the Naples terms of the debt relief will drive the country on
the very fringe of debt sustainability. Anything less favourable to
the country will severely endanger future economic growth and
macroeconomic stability.
As
to the donors' investments, there are a few priorities for FR
Yugoslavia. First of all, our energy and transportation
infrastructure, which is in vary bad shape and that is a major
bottleneck for dynamic economic growths and regional integration.
Second, establishment of the Transition fund aimed at mitigating
social problems created by transition and economic restructuring.
Furthermore, there is a daire need for immediate budgetary support
for social benefits of the most vulnerable segments of our
population. Finally, institutional reform, i.e. building
institutional capacity of the country is a prerequisite for further
reform and economic restructuring. Additionally, that will allow
investments in our human capital.
Acknowledgement
We
would not be here today sharing our views on the future of FR
Yugoslavia and the Region without the true commitment and vigorous
effort of the World Bank and the European Commission. We are
grateful for their support and technical preparation of the
Conference. We are also grateful to all donors who are participating
at the Conference and who will make their pledges. I would like to
stress that the two republican governments and their agencies have
also done an excellent job in preparing this Conference.
Investing in the Future
It
is evident that FR Yugoslavia is a key factor of stability in
Southeast Europe. Without a stable FR Yugoslavia, the Region is in
jeopardy. A politically stable, economically fast growing and
prosperous Yugoslavia is essential for regional stability. A stable
FR Yugoslavia can be achieved only by a strong, stable and reform
oriented Government.
We
are aware that this Donors conference and the contributions of all
donors are based on taxpayers’ money and we are gratefully for
that. But let us consider all the donations pledged as investments
to the future of the Region. These investments will create the
framework for the peace and stability of FRY as well as all other
countries in the region. Investing in the future is definitely much
better option than bearing the costs of conceivable future
instabilities and havoc.
This
statement is also available as audio recording (Real Audio format)
|