Social cohesion and development is
identified as one of the key areas of future Commission
Assistance to Regional Development and Stabilisation (CARDS)
to SE Europe in general and BiH in particular. It is
expected that social development will play a role in
strengthening of the state of BiH, smooth the progress of
return, contribute to the development of a stable society
and bring BiH closer to European standards. Lack of social
development will eventually destabilise the peace process
and jeopardise the stabilisation and association process.
Health, education, social protection and
civil society are principal subsectors. However, ‘social
cohesion and development’ is closely linked with other
sectors, such as economic development (unemployment), labour
market (vocational training), return and human rights.
2. Sector overview
Although progress has been made since
Dayton Agreement was brokered in 1995, the situation remains
fragile. Post-war emergency programmes have focused on
reconstruction of infrastructure, e.g., health centres,
hospitals and schools. Development-oriented TA has replaced
the emergency programmes, yet a lot remains to be done.
A major problem is that ministerial
competencies for the said sectors do exist only on entity
level (for Federation: Cantonal!), which gives way to a
fragmented system. It should be mentioned that return has
been an additional burden across the sectors, draining
further an already little efficient and effective and
under-financed sector.
2.1. Health
Sector overview
The health care system is still
characterised by a poor financing system leading to inequity
in health, shortage of basic services and supplies, such as
drugs, and poor quality of services. Legislation is
fragmented and strategic plans remain just drafts. In
addition, some issues remain uncovered, such as psychosocial
health, a striking phenomenon in country just recovering
from a horrifying war, leaving a large part of the
population with psychological scars. Co-operation between
entities remains fragile, despite the inter-entity health
co-ordinating group.
Previous and ongoing EC co-operation1
The ECHO programme (1991 – 1999)
supported a comprehensive Public Health TA Project (2,5
MEURO) in addition to a major and ambitious reconstruction
programme.
The PHARE 1996 Emergency Assistance
Programme (EAP – appr. 10.5 MEURO) covered the immediate
post-war reconstruction of war-damaged infrastructure. The Laboratory
for Quality Control of Drugs was equipped and received
TA.
Under the PHARE 1997 programme (5.7 MEURO)
support was given to Pharmaceutics Sector Development,
Health Financing and Information Development, and Primary
Health care and Human Resource management. In addition,
two smaller (ongoing) projects provided TA to an integrated
health care in Brcko and to the Laboratory for
Quality Control of Drugs in Sarajevo.
In 2000 two main projects have been
launched under the PHARE 1999 Programme (3.7 MEURO): TA
to support Health Care Reform (2,45 MEURO) and TA to
support Public and Environmental Health (1,45 MEURO).
2.2. Education
Sector overview
Education shows a pattern similar to the
health sector, although political obstructionism has been
even more obvious. Numerous schools have been reconstructed
and re-equipped. But quality often remains poor due to a
lack of qualified teachers, overloaded curricula and poorly
equipped schools. Most of all, political hard-liners
pressing for segregated education is the most blatant
obstruction for a global education reform following modern
and European standards of quality education. If return is
jeopardised by lack of access to health and social services,
it is definitely severed by lack of access to proper
education. As is the case for health, the fragmentation of
the system due to far reaching cantonal authority is a clear
drawback for good and comprehensive governance of the
sector.
Previous and ongoing EC co-operation
Apart from TEMPUS (10 MEURO since 1996)
and EAP (reconstruction infrastructure & equipment –
appr. 2 MEURO) EC assistance has focused mainly on
vocational education and training.
The EC Obnova (1996) Vocational
Training Programme (1.3 MEURO) targeted demobilised
soldiers, returnees, war-widows and handicapped persons.
The PHARE 1997 Vocational Education
and Training programme (3.4 MEURO) supported (1)
Policy and strategy development, (2) curricula development,
teacher training and networking/partnership with European
vocational schools and (3) education and training measures
for reintegration of refugees and other returnees. With
Phare 1999 funds, this project has been extended until June
2001.
In November 2000 a major project, Technical
Assistance to the Educational Reform (TAER), has been
started up under the 1999 budget. This project will support
(a) Education Reform in Primary, Secondary and Higher
Education, (b) Institutional Development and (c) inclusion
of the European dimension in the educational system.
1.3. Social Protection
Sector overview
Combined effects of the war & the
transition to a market economy have led to increased poverty
and exacerbated deficiencies of a social protection system
that was primarily designed for a planned economy with
guaranteed employment under the rules of a Welfare State
providing universal social protection. A viable social
protection system and labour market reforms are urgently
needed. The number of vulnerable people, in particular among
returnees and DPS, is extremely high and put the
stabilisation process at stake. Recent measures by IMF and
World Bank, as well as planned privatisation, will – on a
short term – worsen the situation.
Previous and ongoing EC co-operation
Apart from ECHO support shortly after the
war, EC assistance has been very limited. Through Obnova
1999 about 2 MEURO has been allocated, including 1,5 MEURO
for social infrastructure (Zetra Stadion). 0,4 MEURO was
made available for social protection and safety nets,
resulting in two framework contracts, i.e., (a) Establishment
of a Master Sample Frame for Household Surveys and (b)
TA to Strengthen Capacity of Community Services for Social
Welfare. The household surveys is a multi-donor
initiative to strengthen the State Statistical Institute and
provide a basis for collecting crucial socio-economic data
in BiH.
1.4. Civil Society, Human Rights and
Democracy
Sector overview
Since 1996 BiH has faced a difficult
process of building up a sustainable civil society in BiH.
BiH has no tradition in a third sector as such, as it did
not exist in the previous system apart from some
associations of citizens (trade unions, association of
invalids and youth). The problem lies in changing the
mentality of the public and the treatment of the emerging
third and private sector by the government. A significant
number of the local NGOs have taken a more definite shape
and have provided important contributions to the
establishment of a public opinion in BiH, recognition of the
rule of law and ethnical tolerance over the last 5 years.
Despite a continuous growth, the third sector still faces
major problems, including financial viability, management
and sustainability.
Previous and ongoing EC co-operation
1. Democracy and Human Rights
European Initiative for Democracy and
Human Rights (EIDHR) Programme aims to support development
of democracy and protection of human rights in countries of
central and eastern Europe and of the former Yugoslavia. The
EC has provided funds toward the development and
strengthening of democracy and civil society and protection
of human rights since 1996 for large and small-scale
projects i.e. through macro and micro budget line. Projects
are generally implemented by NGOs.
Budget 1996
1 MEURO out of 5 MEURO allocated for Former Yugoslav
Countries in 1996 is distributed in BiH for the macro projects
that included support to youth centres and children
workshops, rehabilitation and counselling programmes for
refugees and victims of torture, independent media,
institutional building, parliamentary practice. Additional
amount of 0.55 MEURO was for 43 micro projects
with the ceiling of 15.000 EURO per project.
Budget 1997
In 1997 over 3 MEURO was allocated
to the democracy and human rights programme that included a
variety of macro projects and 0.45 MEURO
was allocated for micro. 35 micro projects were
funded during 1997 with a ceiling of 15.000 EURO per
project.
Budget 1998
During 1998 the EC has allocated a
further 3.4 MEURO toward various macro democracy
projects ranging from the promotion of inter-community
relations to rehabilitation projects for victims of torture
during the war. Originally planned allocation of 0.50 MEURO
for micro project in 1998 has been cancelled due to
obstacles met in implementing this project scheme.
Budget 1999
The EC allocated 3.5 MEURO for the
former Yugoslavia countries under the 1999 budget line for macro
project. The list of the recommended projects include the 4
regional projects that applied to all countries in the
region and 2 which direct target area is BiH. 0.23 MEURO
is allocated for 1999 micro projects with increase of
ceiling per project up to 50.000 Euro.
Budget 2000
As announced in the 1999 guidelines for macro
projects, the 1999 call for proposals can be used for 2000
funding. Numerous good projects remained unfounded under the
1999 funds but could be selected for 2000 funding.
8.750 Euro for the micro projects
are planned to be allocated for Bosnia and Herzegovina.
2. LIEN (Link Inter European
NGOs)
The LIEN programme to help disadvantaged
group is an initiative of the European Commission which
follows on from the 1993 NGO programme to support
non-governmental organisations working in the social sector.
The main objective of the Lien programme is to stimulate
initiative and to strengthen the capacity of
non-governmental and non-profit organisations working in the
social sector, in favour of disadvantaged groups of the
population. The programme awards co-financing grants to NGOs
working in the social sector.
Budget 1996
0.45 MEURO was allocated for macro
projects in BiH. The EC advisory board selected 4 for
funding that fulfil the programme’s objectives.
Under the Essential Aid Programme, the
first round of micro projects were financed under the
title "EU’s NGO Programme for Social and Democratic
Development in BiH" as a precursor to the Democracy and
Lien programme which were not open to BiH participation by
that time. Therefore, the Democracy, Human Rights and Lien
projects were funded under the same micro project scheme
with no distinguish among the project lines.
Budget 1997
The EC allocated 0.50 MEURO for
1997 macro projects in BiH. 4 projects were selected
for funding.
0.15 MEURO was allocated for micro
projects. 13 were selected for funding fulfilling the
programme’s objectives.
Budget 1998
Phare Lien is merged with Phare
Partnership programme into one new single programme for NGOs
which is called ACCESS. This programme will be accessible
only for 10 candidates countries of central and eastern
Europe and not for countries of former Yugoslavia.
3. Partnership Programme
The Phare Partnership programme is an NGO
co-financing initiative of the European Commission. It fits
within the wider framework of the European Community (EC)
Phare Programme which goal is to support process of economic
and social reform in the Central and Eastern European
countries (CEECs). The overall objective of the Partnership
programme is to provide financial support for initiatives
that encourage local economic and socio-economic
development.
Budget 1996
0.40 MEURO was allocated for macro
projects in BiH. 3 were selected with the activities that
support local and regional development, business and
enterprise development, human resource development and
training and socio-economic development.
No fund available for micro projects.
Budget 1997
No projects were funded during the 1997
under the macro programme scheme, although the call
for proposal was launched and number of proposals were sent
to the EC Brussels for funding.
0.5 MEURO was allocated for micro projects. 4
projects were selected out of 24 received and are in process
of contracting.
Budget 1998
The Phare Partnership programme is merged
with Phare LIEN programme into one new single programme for
NGOs which is called ACCESS. This programme will be
accessible only for 10 candidates countries of central and
easter Europe and not for countries of former Yugoslavia.